Reference
Machine Base Materials: Grades, Properties, Pros and Cons
16 grades across eight material families, with the numbers the governing standard guarantees, the strengths and weaknesses of each family and how common it is in practice. For the same materials compared as finished constructions, see theconstruction comparison.
Mechanical properties by grade
| Material | Standard | Tensile strength, MPa | Yield strength, MPa | Elongation, % | Modulus, GPa | Density, g/cm³ | Expansion, µm/m/K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grey cast iron | |||||||
| EN-GJL-200 (GG20) | EN 1561 | 200 min, test bar | - | under 1 | about 90 to 115 | 7.1 to 7.3 | about 10 to 11 |
| EN-GJL-250 (GG25) | EN 1561 | 250 min, test bar | - | under 1 | about 100 to 120 | 7.1 to 7.3 | about 10 to 11 |
| EN-GJL-300 (GG30) | EN 1561 | 300 min, test bar | - | under 1 | about 110 to 135 | 7.1 to 7.3 | about 10 to 11 |
| Ductile iron | |||||||
| EN-GJS-400-15 | EN 1563 | 400 min | 250 min | 15 min | about 169 | 7.1 to 7.3 | about 11 |
| EN-GJS-500-7 | EN 1563 | 500 min | 320 min | 7 min | about 169 | 7.1 to 7.3 | about 11 |
| Structural steel for weldments | |||||||
| S235JR | EN 10025-2 | 360 to 510 | 235 min, to 16 mm | about 26 min | about 210 | 7.85 | about 12 |
| S275JR | EN 10025-2 | 410 to 560 | 275 min, to 16 mm | about 23 min | about 210 | 7.85 | about 12 |
| S355J2 | EN 10025-2 | 470 to 630 | 355 min, to 16 mm | about 22 min | about 210 | 7.85 | about 12 |
| ASTM A36 | ASTM A36 | 400 to 550 | 250 min | 20 to 23 min | about 200 | 7.85 | about 12 |
| ASTM A572 Grade 50 | ASTM A572 | 450 min | 345 min | 18 to 21 min | about 200 | 7.85 | about 12 |
| Q235B | GB/T 700 | 370 to 500 | 235 min, to 16 mm | about 26 min | about 210 | 7.85 | about 12 |
| Q355B | GB/T 1591 | 470 to 630 | 355 min, to 16 mm | about 22 min | about 210 | 7.85 | about 12 |
| SS400 | JIS G3101 | 400 to 510 | 245 min, to 16 mm | 17 to 23 min, by thickness | about 210 | 7.85 | about 12 |
| Mineral and stone | |||||||
| Natural black granite (gabbro, diabase) | Quarry test data | Compressive about 200 to 300; no useful tensile strength | Brittle, no yield | Brittle | about 50 to 100 | 2.9 to 3.1 | about 5 to 8 |
| Epoxy granite (mineral cast) | Supplier formulation | Compressive about 100 to 160; flexural about 15 to 30 | Brittle, no yield | Brittle | about 30 to 50 | about 2.3 to 2.6 | about 12 to 16 |
| Light alloy | |||||||
| Aluminium EN AW-6061-T6 | EN 485 / EN 573 | about 290 | about 240 | about 8 to 10 | about 69 | about 2.7 | about 23 |
Reading the numbers
Grey iron strength is a test bar value. The grade number is minimum tensile strength on a separately cast bar. A thick wall in the real casting is weaker, so state the grade together with the governing section.
Grey iron has no yield. It does not bend and recover, it breaks. That is why the dash in the yield column matters more than the tensile figure.
Strength is rarely the limit
A machine base is almost always governed by stiffness and vibration, not by stress. Stress in a welded base wall is typically a small fraction of yield, so moving up from S275 to S355 gains little. The modulus column, geometry and damping decide more than the strength column does.
Steel and aluminium have a similar stiffness to weight ratio. Aluminium is lighter and a third as stiff, so it needs thicker sections to match.
Thermal behaviour and damping
| Material | Thermal conductivity, W/m/K | Expansion, µm/m/K | Damping against steel |
|---|---|---|---|
| Welded steel | about 45 to 50 | about 12 | Lowest of the set |
| Grey cast iron | about 40 to 55 | about 10 to 11 | Several times better than steel; flake graphite does the work |
| Ductile iron | about 30 to 36 | about 11 | Better than steel, clearly below grey iron |
| Filled weldment | Reduced by the core | As the steel shell | Good to very good, depends on the fill and how well it bonds |
| Natural granite | about 2 to 3.5 | about 5 to 8 | Very good |
| Epoxy granite | about 1 to 2 | about 12 to 16 | Highest of the set |
| Aluminium | about 120 to 170 | about 23 | Low, similar to steel |
How common each material is
This is an editorial judgement from how machine bases are built, not a market share. No public statistic splits machine base tonnage by material, so none is quoted.
| Material | How common | Where it is used |
|---|---|---|
| Grey cast iron | Very common | The standard material for series-built machine tools: machining centres, lathes, grinders, presses. |
| Ductile (spheroidal graphite) iron | Occasional | Used where grey iron is too brittle: shock loads, tensile or cyclic loading, thin-walled castings. |
| Meehanite and other controlled irons | Specialist | A licensed, process-controlled family. Seen on high-end machine tools and with a few established foundries. |
| Welded structural steel | Very common | The most used construction overall for custom, large, heavy or low-volume bases, and for prototypes. |
| Concrete-filled or mineral-filled weldment | Uncommon | Used when a steel design fails a vibration target and a casting is not worth the tooling. Slowly spreading. |
| Natural granite | Common in precision, rare elsewhere | Standard for coordinate measuring machines and some precision grinders, lasers and inspection equipment. |
| Epoxy granite (polymer concrete, mineral cast) | Established niche | Common in precision grinding and high-speed machines. Rare among large, heavy or one-off machines. |
| Aluminium plate or casting | Specialist, small machines | Seen on small gantries, routers, laser and desktop machines, where weight and machining time matter more than stiffness. |
Pros and cons by material
Very common
Grey cast iron
EN-GJL-200 to 300, GG20 to GG30, ASTM A48 Class 30 to 45, HT200 to HT300
Pros
- Flake graphite damps vibration well, several times better than steel
- Casts into ribbed, closed, complex shapes that would need dozens of welds
- Machines cleanly and wears well as a sliding surface
- Cheapest per part once a pattern exists and volume repeats
- Compressive strength of three to four times its tensile strength suits a base in compression
Cons
- Brittle: no yield, fractures without warning under tension or impact
- A pattern costs time and money, so the first part is slow and a design change is expensive
- Properties vary with section thickness, thick walls are weaker than the test bar
- Casting defects (porosity, shrinkage, chill) can sit hidden until machining
- Hard to weld or repair
Occasional
Ductile (spheroidal graphite) iron
EN-GJS-400-15, EN-GJS-500-7, ASTM A536 65-45-12
Pros
- Yields and stretches before it breaks, far more tolerant of impact and tension
- Higher strength than grey iron at the same section
- Higher modulus than grey iron, about 169 GPa
- Same casting freedom as grey iron
Cons
- Damps noticeably less than grey iron, which is why it is rarely the first choice for a bed
- Harder to cast sound, more demanding on the foundry (magnesium treatment, shrinkage control)
- Pattern cost and lead time are the same as grey iron
- Costs more than grey iron per kilogram
Specialist
Meehanite and other controlled irons
Meehanite GA, GC, GE and similar licensed grades
Pros
- Foundry process and metallurgy controlled and recorded to a licensed method
- More uniform properties through varying section thickness
- Good wear and machinability for ways and guideways
Cons
- Available only from licensed foundries, so supply is narrow
- Costs more than an ordinary grade, and you pay for the control, not a different alloy
- Properties do not beat a well-run grey iron enough to justify it on most machines
Guide 1
Very common
Welded structural steel
S235, S275, S355 (EN 10025); A36, A572 Gr 50 (ASTM); Q235, Q355 (GB); SS400 (JIS)
Pros
- No pattern, so the first part is fastest and a design change is a cut and a weld
- Highest modulus of the common options, about 210 GPa, so the thinnest walls for a given stiffness
- Tough: yields and warns before failure, can be repaired and modified after delivery
- Practically no size limit, and plate and section are available everywhere
- Cost per part stays flat, which suits one-offs and small runs
Cons
- Lowest damping of the set, a bare steel box rings and can chatter
- Welding leaves residual stress and distortion, so stress relief and machining allowance are required
- Quality depends on the weld procedure and the shop, not only the plate grade
- Per-unit cost does not fall much with volume
- Strength grade rarely matters: bases are limited by stiffness, so S355 over S275 buys little
Uncommon
Concrete-filled or mineral-filled weldment
Steel shell to the grades above with a concrete, polymer or mineral core
Pros
- Adds mass and damping to a weldment without a pattern or mould
- Keeps the steel shell as the load path, so strength and toughness stay
- Design changes on the shell stay cheap
Cons
- The fill is the supplier’s own formulation, with no grade standard to point at
- Core cannot be repaired, and a poor bond leaves voids that damp nothing
- Adds weight and a cure period
- Reduced thermal conduction can make heat distribute unevenly
Common in precision, rare elsewhere
Natural granite
Fine-grained black gabbro or diabase, sold as black granite; ISO 8512-2 for surface plate grades
Pros
- Low thermal expansion and low conduction, holds its shape as the shop warms and cools
- No rust, no residual stress, non-magnetic
- Very good damping
- Lapped to flatness that a metal base can only reach with extensive scraping
Cons
- Brittle and heavy, with little tolerance for impact or point loads
- Properties depend on the quarry, so ask for the stone name and test data
- Thread inserts must be bonded in, and changes after the stone is cut are impractical
- Cutting, lapping and shipping are slow and cost a lot for large pieces
Established niche
Epoxy granite (polymer concrete, mineral cast)
Graded mineral aggregate in epoxy resin, supplier formulation
Pros
- The highest damping of the options listed here
- Cast cold into a mould, so there is no stress relief and little distortion
- Inserts, ducts and cooling channels cast in place, cutting machining and assembly
- No corrosion, no paint
- Density of roughly a third of iron, so a lighter part at the cost of bulk
Cons
- Lower stiffness per unit volume, so walls are thick and the part bulky
- Weak in tension, loads go through cast-in inserts and need careful design
- The mould is the design: a late change is the most expensive of all constructions
- Cannot be repaired, and has no grading standard to specify against
- Pays off only above a certain volume, or where damping is the whole point
Specialist, small machines
Aluminium plate or casting
EN AW-6061-T6, 5083, cast A356
Pros
- About a third the density of steel, very light for handling
- Machines fast and cleanly, with no welding or casting needed for plate bases
- Does not rust
Cons
- Modulus about a third of steel, so a base of the same stiffness needs thicker sections
- Expands about twice as much as steel with temperature
- Low damping, and a cutting-load structure often rings
- Price per kilogram is several times that of steel
- Heavy machines are not a fit: size and load are limited
Which one, in four lines
- Repeat series with a stable design: grey iron.
- One-off, large or likely to change: welded steel, stress relieved.
- A steel design that chatters: a filled weldment before a redesign.
- Precision where heat or damping rules: granite or epoxy granite, and accept the cost.
Not sure? The self-check on the home page asks six questions and suggests a construction. It runs in your browser and nothing is submitted.
Related
- Construction comparison: the same materials as finished parts
- Manufacturing technologies: how each one is made
- Standards index: EN 1561, EN 1563, EN 10025 and the rest
- Glossary